After former prime minister Jean Chrétien survived brain surgery this weekend, the current prime minister, Stephen Harper, issued a statement wishing him well.
"Mr. Chrétien, I am sure, will emerge as he always has from every challenge, by winning," Harper said.
I'm sure that Harper had the former prime minister's best interest at heart. But Harper is also smart enough to know that if Chrétien's health takes a turn for the worse and he dies, it could trigger a wave of nostalgia.
And that could conceivably return the federal Liberals to power.
A recent Ekos poll by showed that the Conservatives have fallen below 30 percent for the first time since 2006. Harper's crew came in at just 29.7 percent support.
The Liberals under Michael Ignatieff rose to 28.5 percent, creating a neck-and-neck race.
In a commentary on his site, Ekos head Frank Graves attributed the Conservative drop to the "highly questionable decision to announce the end of the one-in-five long form census".
"Call it the revenge of the propeller heads, but the swift reaction of the educated class suggests they see bigger stakes than simply the 2B Census," Graves wrote. "This may be the latest expression of a real culture conflict over the role of knowledge and expertise in society."
Here in B.C., Harper hasn't won much support from educated voters with his ostrich-like approach to climate change and his government's legal fight against Vancouver's supervised-injection site.
Harper's spin doctors appear to have taken note of Graves's concerns.
This weekend, the federal government Web site's lead story on the home page highlights new spending on science and technology.
The headline reads: "Government of Canada Bolsters Canada's Knowledge Economy".
The announcement came from science minister Gary Goodyear, who initially refused to tell the Globe and Mail last year if he believes in the theory of evolution.
Later, he reversed himself, though his original quote was: “I’m not going to answer that question. I am a Christian, and I don’t think anybody asking a question about my religion is appropriate.”
In addition to keeping an eye on the science file, Harper might also want to say a prayer for Chrétien's health.
When former Liberal prime minister Pierre Trudeau died on September 28, 2000, the Liberal party benefited from an incredible public outpouring of grief.
Chrétien, a wily political operator, called a snap election less than a month after Trudeau's passing. And on November 27, 2000, the Liberals won their third consecutive majority government.
While Chrétien might not match Trudeau's stature, there are still many voters who recall how well the economy performed during the Chrétien years.
Ignatieff is already trying to exploit this in his public appearances. This message would resonate to an even greater degree if the country were to be grieving the unexpected loss of the former Liberal prime minister.
If Chrétien keeps "winning" on the health front, as Harper so cleverly put it, the Conservatives probably have a better chance of winning the next election.
Follow Charlie Smith on Twitter at twitter.com/csmithstraight.





Comment (34)
Comments
Watch how this writer has slipped in "Ignatieff is trying to exploit this" in a really scummy article speculating about Chretien's death, to link Ignatieff with the speculation, instead of the writer.
Charlie Smith - mediocre scumbag writer.
The writer has no scruples, Liberals really ARE desperate.!
Nothing can rescue Ignatieff from political oblivion unless Donolo can create an election campaign based on voting for the local party candidate and ignoring the fact that Iggy would be PM by default.
Conservative election strategists would not let that happen .. and will decapitate the Liberal leader from his Liberal body politic.
There are still "many voters who recall how well the economy performed during the Chrétien years.". So when he dies, Ignatieff, who wasn't around in those glory days, is going to channel Chretien via a ouija board, to get instructions on how to run the country ?
Seriously? Do you honestly that the strategist Harper is NOT considering the effect his death would have? This is Politics 101, understand what your enemy is doing, understand how it affects you, counter it.
Don't shoot the messenger.
Sunday morning down at Stevey "Brimstone" Hapro's CRAP (Con/Reform/ALLIANCE (church?)) HQ in Boulder CO, the word goes out to all the parishes in Canada, telling the preacher men to get up on those hind legs and exhort the sheep to smit the those Liberals - agents of the Lucifer all.
Cut and paste scripts are posted on the CRAP website.
And here they all are.
seth
What I see is a massive amount of political immaturity and naiveté by political commentator wannabes.
http://civicscene.ca/an-absolutely-classless-piece-of-journalism-by-char...
May I say to them; "grow up because you will never be a good commenter if you can't see 3 minutes into the future."
So here it is in plain fact: people die, politicians die, and the world goes on and it is absolutely no use whatsoever if we pretend a politicians death doesn't alter political strategy!
Grow up people!
The Opposition - would like the Census issue to be presented as the one that got Harper -- but it isn't -- it is additional evidence - not the core of the reason (for dwindling support).
Now the banks are cutting off the currency and credit supply, and you have been saddled with the debt.
We will blame our current leaders for bad economies. We praise our past leaders for good economies. They were not in control then or now. The banks decide how our economies fare, not the politicians who serve them.
"We are completely dependant on the commercial banks. Someone has to borrow every dollar we have in circulation, cash or credit. If the banks create ample synthetic money we are prosperous; if not, we starve. We are absolutely without a permanent money system.... It is the most important subject intelligent persons can investigate and reflect upon. It is so important that our present civilization may collapse unless it becomes widely understood and the defects remedied very soon."
-- Robert H. Hamphill, Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank
"Once a nation parts with the control of its currency and credit,
it matters not who makes the nations laws. Usury, once in control,
will wreck any nation. Until the control of the issue of currency
and credit is restored to government and recognized as its most sacred
responsibility, all talk of the sovereignty of parliament and
of democracy is idle and futile."
-Prime Minister William Lyon MacKenzie King, 10th Prime Minister of Canada
This is a complex problem with a simple solution. It's time to elect leaders who tell the truth.
Nobody has told you about the banking. Try this tomorrow: Walk up to your bank teller and ask them how money is created. They will have no idea. They weren't taught. None of us were taught in school, because the teachers do not know, as they were never taught.
Henry Ford said, The people of the nation do not understand our monetary and fiscal policy, for if they did, we would have revolution before tomorrow morning.
This is a long journey.
But start here:
youtube.com/thetruthparty
We will form a new provincial government in 2013, and then spread our new model of economics and transparency worldwide.
Truth Party:
Blueprint for Free Humanity
Consider what the opponents of the Truth Party must represent.
Having said that, I vote center or center-left, but Michael Ignatieff leading the Liberals does nothing for me and until a younger, charismatic leader with vision comes along (Gerrard Kennedy, Justin Trudeau?) they won't be seeing my vote anytime soon. Oh, and I think the Cons are pretty useless as well.